Extractable and Leachable Studies in Pharmaceuticals: A Deep Dive into USP <1663>, <1664>, and AET

Extractable and Leachable Studies in Pharmaceuticals: A Deep Dive into USP <1663>, <1664>, and AET

What Are Extractables and Leachables in Pharmaceuticals?

In the pharmaceutical industry, it’s vital to evaluate whether packaging materials interact with a drug product in a way that could compromise safety or quality. This evaluation is performed through extractable and leachable (E&L) studies, guided by USP <1663> and USP <1664>.

  • Extractables: Compounds that can be drawn from packaging materials under aggressive conditions.
  • Leachables: Compounds that migrate into the drug product during shelf life under actual conditions of use.

These studies are foundational for ensuring drug safety, stability, and regulatory compliance.

USP <1663>: Extractables Testing Guidelines

Key Objectives:

  • Identify potential leachables early.
  • Guide material selection and formulation design.
  • Support the design of leachables testing (USP <1664>).

Study Process:

  • Extraction with solvents like water, ethanol, hexane, acid/base under exaggerated conditions.
  • Use of analytical technologies such as:
    • GC-MS – Volatile and semi-volatile organics
    • LC-MS – Non-volatile organics
    • ICP-MS – Elemental impurities

Outcome: Identification of compounds that may leach and inform leachables study planning.

USP <1664>: Leachables Testing Guidelines

Key Objectives:

  • Confirm actual patient exposure to potential migrants.
  • Assess toxicological risk.
  • Support product approval and post-approval compliance.

Study Process:

  • Conducted on the final packaged drug product under long-term storage conditions.
  • Performed over time points aligned with ICH stability guidelines.
  • Uses validated analytical methods sensitive enough to detect low-level leachables.

Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET): A Critical Concept in USP <1664>

The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) defines the minimum concentration at which an individual leachable compound must be reported and evaluated during a leachables study.

Why AET Matters:

  • Differentiates between compounds needing toxicological assessment and those that don’t.
  • Ensures low-level impurities below safety concern thresholds aren’t over-evaluated.

How AET Is Calculated:

AET is derived from the Safety Concern Threshold (SCT) and depends on:

  • Maximum daily dose of the drug product
  • Analytical uncertainty factor

Example Formula:
AET = SCT / Maximum Daily Dose × Uncertainty Factor

Note: A typical SCT for most pharmaceuticals is 1.5 µg/day, but lower values may apply to inhalation, injectable, or pediatric products.

USP <1663> vs. USP <1664> and the Role of AET

Feature USP <1663> (Extractables) USP <1664> (Leachables)
Study Type Exaggerated lab conditions Real-time, stability-based testing
Sample Packaging or device materials Final drug product
Output Potential leachables profile Actual leachables profile
Regulatory Relevance Material screening and risk planning Direct input to regulatory filing
AET Relevance Not applicable Defines reporting threshold for leachables

Why Extractable and Leachable Studies—and AET—Are Essential

  1. Protect Patient Safety: Prevent exposure to toxic or carcinogenic substances.
  2. Ensure Regulatory Compliance: Meet expectations of FDA, EMA, and other authorities.
  3. Stabilize Product Development: Ensure compatibility of formulation and packaging.
  4. Streamline Risk Assessment: Use AET to focus on toxicologically relevant compounds.
  5. Enable Quality by Design (QbD): Use E&L data proactively in early stages.

Conclusion: Strengthening Safety Through E&L and AET Compliance

Extractable and leachable studies, supported by USP <1663>, USP <1664>, and the AET concept, are integral to modern pharmaceutical development. They form a comprehensive framework for risk mitigation, ensuring both regulatory compliance and patient safety.

Early investment in E&L analysis and scientifically justified AET calculations helps avoid regulatory delays and supports a robust product lifecycle.

Related Articles:

You cannot copy content of this page